This isn't a topic that I care about a lot, but the USSC upheld a ban on transgender people from participating in womens' sports.

Here's the part that I find interesting: Justice Sosomayor said "There's no evidence that it's dangerous for women to compete with transgender people."

It's probably true that not much proof exists, but how irresponsible would it be to allow men to compete in boxing matches against women? Or what about an MMA match? Even ice hockey; what happens when an angry tranny guy hits a woman with a hockey stick? Sotomayor thinks we should FAFO.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-

This isn't a topic that I care about a lot, but the USSC upheld a ban
on transgender people from participating in womens' sports.

You mean "mentally ill men" not "transgender people".

Here's the part that I find interesting: Justice Sosomayor said
"There's no evidence that it's dangerous for women to compete with transgender people."

It's probably true that not much proof exists,

Oh, piles of proof exist. But the Media suppresses it.

Man on women's volleyball team who spikes the ball so hard that it caused a concussion in the girl he hit.

Woman's wrestling: She wasn't told that her opponent was a mentally ill man, wrestled and he sexually assulted her. There's a court case on this.

Those are just the recent ones and the ones that couldn't be suppressed. Then there's all the ones that the girls were too embarassed to push forward.

but how irresponsible
would it be to allow men to compete in boxing matches against women?

Already happened. The woman was seriously injured in the boxing match with the mentally ill man.

tranny guy hits a woman with a hockey stick? Sotomayor thinks we should FAFO.

That is incorrect. Sotomayor can't think. She only says what she's programmed to.


... My other computer is a Tandy 1400LT.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

This isn't a topic that I care about a lot, but the USSC upheld a ban on transgender people from participating in womens' sports.

You mean "mentally ill men" not "transgender people".

You're right. This subject doesn't address hermaphrodite people and/or mentally ill women, the danger is mainly from mentally ill men and/or men who get gratification from overpowering female athletes.

"There's no evidence that it's dangerous for women to compete with transgender people."

It's probably true that not much proof exists,

Oh, piles of proof exist. But the Media suppresses it.

Right again. I was trying too hard to be polite about Sotomayor's BS, but the stench is too strong. But at the same time I'll still insist that any media reports in circulation might not be factual, despite the likelihood that they are. Whoever brought that case to the court should have included verifiable evidence and it's possible that they didn't.

IOW: Whoever brought that case to the court should have considered the fact that there are idiots on the bench who live in an alternate reality and that simple observations aren't simple enough for them.

But all in all our USSC is doing pretty good. We just need one of the leftist justices to resign or retire before 2029 and we'll be totally set.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

You're right. This subject doesn't address hermaphrodite people and/or mentally ill women, the danger is mainly from mentally ill men and/or
men who get gratification from overpowering female athletes.

The ones who overpower female athletes are the ones who want the fame, but can't do it against men. We're back to the "envy problem" again.

But there's also the ones who like to expose themselves to women, especially young girls.

Right again. I was trying too hard to be polite about Sotomayor's BS,
but the stench is too strong.

I wouldn't be. Sotomayor's a "judge" just like Jackson is a "judge". Neither are there to actually uphold the Constitution, but rather to subvert it.

But at the same time I'll still insist
that any media reports in circulation might not be factual, despite the likelihood that they are.

At this point, that is very likely true. Even if they do report the "facts" they will probably not report all of them, leaving key points out.

Whoever brought that case to the court should
have included verifiable evidence and it's possible that they didn't.

It's hard to find evidence of something that doesn't exist.

IOW: Whoever brought that case to the court should have considered the fact that there are idiots on the bench who live in an alternate
reality and that simple observations aren't simple enough for them.

On that topic: I heard a rumor that Barrett and Roberts have received large gifts from Soros. If that's true, then they should be removed from the bench as they cannot be considered impartial.

But all in all our USSC is doing pretty good. We just need one of the leftist justices to resign or retire before 2029 and we'll be totally
set.

I think they are batting about 50% right now. Better than a Leftist stacked court, but the Birthright Citizenship ruling showed that they are compromised.


... Dentist's famous last words: "You won't feel a thing..."
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)