• Re: Big Tech Political Co

    From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Mon Aug 11 07:08:40 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    A better experience sounds good, but the elite are full of it. Speed
    just isn't an issue anymore, and they're using it as an excuse to
    achieve financial goals (it was probably planned at the WEF.)

    Possibly. Microsoft has been pushing that for years now.

    That's another possible explanation for the graphics acceleration
    thing; if they're not doing it to sell more hardware, they're doing it
    to make things easier for their monkeys.

    And that's probably another reason.

    I used to always think that Microsoft was evil. They take a standard, warp it to make it easy for Windows (but no one else), then push it as the new "standard".

    But then I realized that they were staffed by incompetent Indians who simply could not understand the standard. So they did their best, and Microsoft just used their "might" to push their (poor) implementation as "standard".

    So now I think that they are incompetent AND evil.

    ... ...I multi-task, I read in the bathroom.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/200 to Ron L. on Mon Aug 11 08:29:47 2025
    A better experience sounds good, but the elite are full of it. Speed just isn't an issue anymore, and they're using it as an excuse to achieve financial goals (it was probably planned at the WEF.)

    Possibly. Microsoft has been pushing that for years now.

    It's a way for them to "justify" things; "Your page doesn't rank as high in search results as Wikipedia because.. uh... your page loads too slowly."

    I used to always think that Microsoft was evil. They take a standard, warp it to make it easy for Windows (but no one else), then push it as
    the new "standard".

    But then I realized that they were staffed by incompetent Indians who simply could not understand the standard. So they did their best, and Microsoft just used their "might" to push their (poor) implementation as "standard".

    Part of the issue is their priorities. Could it be that the internet is still slow in India? So they need "graphics acceleration" because "web pages load
    too slowly?" I doubt it, but it does make me wonder if their developers live in their moms' basements, and mom can't afford broadband so their using dial-up. lol

    So now I think that they are incompetent AND evil.

    This is a much more likely scenario.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Tue Aug 12 07:23:40 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    Part of the issue is their priorities. Could it be that the internet is still slow in India? So they need "graphics acceleration" because "web pages load too slowly?" I doubt it, but it does make me wonder if their developers live in their moms' basements, and mom can't afford
    broadband so their using dial-up. lol

    There was a joke that software developers should be forced to have the same kind of connections to the Internet that their customers do, just so they can see how performanent their web pages are for the people who actually use them.

    But the reality is economic:
    1. Hardware companies want to sell more hardware and making you buy a new PC every 3-5 years.
    2. Software companies want to sell you more software. So they either make their software not run on newer PCs, or force an update that doesn't work on your new PC, or push you to a subscription model.

    In any case, it's to make some company more money by pushing you to buy something you really don't need.

    I bypassed much of that by moving to Linux a long time ago.

    So now I think that they are incompetent AND evil.

    This is a much more likely scenario.

    Oh, I know it is now.


    ... If (Wife = "yes") then (MONEY = "Gone") else Single
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/200 to Ron L. on Tue Aug 12 09:03:32 2025
    1. Hardware companies want to sell more hardware and making you buy a
    new PC every 3-5 years.

    They invented this game.

    2. Software companies want to sell you more software. So they either
    make their software not run on newer PCs, or force an update that
    doesn't work on your new PC, or push you to a subscription model.

    I never even used 64 bit processors until 2019. The only reason I even upgraded was because I couldn't find a compatibile usb wifi adapter for 32 bit Linux kernels.

    So I got a 64 bit PC with integrated graphics, because I'm not a gamer and I didn't care about graphics. But now look where I'm at: My GPU is outdated for compatibility with Chrome and Edge browser. IOW: Even if you don't need good graphics, you need good graphics.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Wed Aug 13 07:51:40 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    So I got a 64 bit PC with integrated graphics, because I'm not a gamer
    and I didn't care about graphics. But now look where I'm at: My GPU is outdated for compatibility with Chrome and Edge browser. IOW: Even if
    you don't need good graphics, you need good graphics.

    A thought entered my mind.

    AI uses mostly GPU-type processors.

    What if the reason the corporate browsers supposedly need more powerful GPUs is to create a huge, distributed AI.

    Microsoft already thinks it owns your computer. Why not every other tech company?


    ... Never insult 7 men when all you're packing is a 6-shooter
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/200 to Ron L. on Wed Aug 13 14:01:39 2025
    A thought entered my mind.

    AI uses mostly GPU-type processors.

    What if the reason the corporate browsers supposedly need more powerful GPUs is to create a huge, distributed AI.

    Microsoft already thinks it owns your computer. Why not every other tech company?

    I wasn't aware of that. It's a good point. Do they really care if people buy new computers these days, with all the smartphones/tablets/chromebooks that are in circulation? Probably not! I don't know anyone (personally) who still sits in front of the computer all day like I do.

    You're right to suspect a connection to AI's demand, but how could us
    upgrading our GPUs benefit the evil AI people? Maybe they expect to eventually have their AI more directly connected to our computers. There already is some kind of "Claude on your desktop" for top tier Claude subscribers.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Thu Aug 14 07:52:14 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    I wasn't aware of that. It's a good point. Do they really care if
    people buy new computers these days, with all the smartphones/tablets/chromebooks that are in circulation? Probably not!
    I don't know anyone (personally) who still sits in front of the
    computer all day like I do.

    I sit in front of a computer all day. But I will admit that I'm probably not the norm. But I'm productive sitting in front of that computer instead of most people with their phones Doom scrolling all day.

    You're right to suspect a connection to AI's demand, but how could us upgrading our GPUs benefit the evil AI people?

    Assuming (and that's a big assumption) my theory is correct: More available GPU power to the big tech firms.

    AI has lots of power. For example, many companies offer "anonymized" customer data. But if you feed that data into an AI, they can quickly de-anonymize that data, reconstituting basically your digital footprint.

    Maybe they expect to
    eventually have their AI more directly connected to our computers.
    There already is some kind of "Claude on your desktop" for top tier
    Claude subscribers.

    We already know that they want AIs on our phones, tablets and computers, watching everything we do to "provide a better experience". But the unsaid part is 'collecting data about everything you do/go/say'.


    ... Procrastination Day Has Been Postponed!
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/200 to Ron L. on Thu Aug 14 09:02:20 2025
    I sit in front of a computer all day. But I will admit that I'm
    probably not the norm. But I'm productive sitting in front of that computer instead of most people with their phones Doom scrolling all day.


    I've noticed that too. My computer hobby educates me, and I'm building something cool during the process. But when I see people wasting the day away on videos that dis-educate them, it makes me realize that their psych is being wasted and that they could and should be doing something creative as well.

    Assuming (and that's a big assumption) my theory is correct: More available GPU power to the big tech firms.

    AI has lots of power. For example, many companies offer "anonymized" customer data. But if you feed that data into an AI, they can quickly de-anonymize that data, reconstituting basically your digital footprint.

    This is a good theory. I've heard about AI processors demanding more power, but I'm not sold on the reasons given for it, similar to how I'm not sold on the need for accelerated graphics in web browsing. I am sold on the fact that the elite want as much information about us as possible, and it's perfectly logical to use that as a basis when trying to decode their secretive behavior.

    It's suspicious how I stumbled upon the issue with my web browser, of all things. It would have been more compelling if I got the alert through an OS update instead "The latest version of Debian doesn't work with your outdated GPU." But Chrome/Edge giving me that message? Very suspicious.

    We already know that they want AIs on our phones, tablets and computers, watching everything we do to "provide a better experience". But the unsaid part is 'collecting data about everything you do/go/say'.

    That's it. And this information they collect is surely going to be used in their effort to control us.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Sat Aug 16 18:18:18 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    I've noticed that too. My computer hobby educates me, and I'm building something cool during the process. But when I see people wasting the
    day away on videos that dis-educate them, it makes me realize that
    their psych is being wasted and that they could and should be doing something creative as well.

    Like any tool, it can be used for good or evil. I recall when computers were first introduced to schools. There were many opinions being thrown around.

    But the bottom line is that, with the educational software available at the time, the "gifted" students could progress without being held back by the teacher who didn't want to work harder. So, of course, they had to "fix" that.

    This is a good theory. I've heard about AI processors demanding more power, but I'm not sold on the reasons given for it, similar to how I'm not sold on the need for accelerated graphics in web browsing. I am
    sold on the fact that the elite want as much information about us as possible, and it's perfectly logical to use that as a basis when trying
    to decode their secretive behavior.

    Another theory: Most operating systems today have lots of checks to make sure that the CPU isn't running anything malicious. But would those checks work on a GPU? A requirement for more GPU power potentially because it's running spyware that's not detectable today?

    That's it. And this information they collect is surely going to be used
    in their effort to control us.

    Chekhov's gun:
    "If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there".


    ... When choosing between two evils, select the newer one.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/200 to Ron L. on Sat Aug 16 21:00:21 2025
    not sold on the need for accelerated graphics in web browsing. I am sold on the fact that the elite want as much information about us as possible, and it's perfectly logical to use that as a basis when tryi to decode their secretive behavior.

    Another theory: Most operating systems today have lots of checks to
    make sure that the CPU isn't running anything malicious. But would
    those checks work on a GPU? A requirement for more GPU power
    potentially because it's running spyware that's not detectable today?

    This makes me realize that the Chrome/Edge developers are probably not targeting people with old hardware in an effort to get them to buy new hardware, because most people have already been conned into buying newer hardware and into using Windows. So they already have them where they want them.

    It seems like this is an effort to target the smaller population of PC users who use linux and/or older machines. How are they victimizing the Windows/newer PC people already, and why do they care to get the smaller population on-board?

    Maybe the newer GPUs (and I hope I 'm wrong about this) are releasing toxic chemicals, or something. Spying seems like a good guess too but I just don't see how it's possible through the GPU.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Sun Aug 17 09:43:50 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    This makes me realize that the Chrome/Edge developers are probably not targeting people with old hardware in an effort to get them to buy new hardware, because most people have already been conned into buying
    newer hardware and into using Windows. So they already have them where they want them.

    Probably. But I haven't used Windows for my personal computers for literally decades now. Work is the only thing that uses Windows and the IT dept usually dictates what versions of software we run.

    Which is probably why I never see stuff like this myself. It's covered in a "Somebody else's problem field".

    It seems like this is an effort to target the smaller population of PC users who use linux and/or older machines. How are they victimizing the Windows/newer PC people already, and why do they care to get the
    smaller population on-board?

    They already tried this with the TPM and "secure" boot stuff. But failed.

    And while Linux is a smaller population than Windows, it's not a small population - as many hardware vendors found out fast when they made Windows-only systems for a short period.

    But I think we are barking up the wrong tree when it comes to "force users to upgrade" idea.

    That's been tried. It's failed (often horribly). So it must be something else.


    ... Wife to sleeping spouse: "Wake up! Who the hell is Tina!!?"
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/200 to Ron L. on Sun Aug 17 10:10:46 2025
    And while Linux is a smaller population than Windows, it's not a small population - as many hardware vendors found out fast when they made Windows-only systems for a short period.

    But I think we are barking up the wrong tree when it comes to "force
    users to upgrade" idea.

    That's been tried. It's failed (often horribly). So it must be
    something else.

    Yea, and the possibilities are scary. The next thing to watch out for will be a large-scale effort to get people to keep their computers turned on at all times.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)

Novedades:

Servidor de Quake 3 Arena Online! - Conectate a ferchobbs.ddns.net, puerto 27960 y vence con tu equipo!