• Re: Political Eggs

    From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Kurt Weiske on Sat Feb 15 21:20:52 2025
    I'm glad that you see this for what it is. What can be done about the narrative that says "We have to mutate viruses to make them 20x more deadly in order to create better vaccines?" There are people swallowi that like it's a tiny pill.

    I've never heard that narrative. I've heard the narrative that viruses could be groomed to make effective weapons in the ultimate in
    asymmetric warfare. And our worst nightmares.

    When I make a query about this, Google refers me to an article from scientificamerican.com that says this:

    "Scientists perform these manipulations for many reasons, including wanting to understand how the microbes evade detection by our immune systems."

    They should study the effects of shoving their research up their pee holes.

    else are we being blind about? It would be foolish for us to believe that viruses are the primary choice for weaponizing innocent things. There could be nuclear bombs in our toasters for all we know.

    A virus is a lot cheaper.

    Good point. It's also easier to evade blame. But there's no way that viruses are the only experiment in progress.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Sun Feb 16 09:33:04 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-

    Look how blind we were when the covid-19 pandemic was launched. What
    else are we being blind about? It would be foolish for us to believe
    that viruses are the primary choice for weaponizing innocent things.
    There could be nuclear bombs in our toasters for all we know.

    We weren't blind. We were lied to. We were gaslit. Our institutions were discovered to have been hollowed out and turned into skinsuits for the Woke. Everything we had been programmed to trust turned out to be filled with liars.

    And it was done so quietly and slowly that few people noticed.


    ... Reality is an obstacle to hallucination.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Sun Feb 16 09:58:00 2025
    Nothing you've posted above indicates that they are researching the weaponization of the virus. Trump is in charge now, and certainly he would *never* allow such a thing, right?

    The conclusions indicate it. Scientists are playing with viruses, they've been doing it for a long time, some secretively, yet there's still no cure for
    any virus, and very few viruses have a vaccine.

    Depends on what you mean by "cure." If you visit your local cemetary, you
    will find a lot of young child and baby graves from before the 1900s, and likely quite a few less from after. Why? Because of vaccines. Polio, Smallpox, Diptheria, etc., didn't just go away on their own.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Computers make very fast, very efficient mistakes.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Ron L. on Sun Feb 16 08:52:14 2025
    Look how blind we were when the covid-19 pandemic was launched. What else are we being blind about? It would be foolish for us to believe that viruses are the primary choice for weaponizing innocent things. There could be nuclear bombs in our toasters for all we know.

    We weren't blind. We were lied to. We were gaslit. Our institutions were discovered to have been hollowed out and turned into skinsuits for the Woke. Everything we had been programmed to trust turned out to be filled with liars.

    And it was done so quietly and slowly that few people noticed.

    That's what I mean. I wonder a lot about other potential lies that we're falling for. It could be things that are right under our noses, but we might not figure it out fast enough.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Sun Feb 16 10:59:50 2025
    Nothing you've posted above indicates that they are researching the weaponization of the virus. Trump is in charge now, and certainly would *never* allow such a thing, right?

    The conclusions indicate it. Scientists are playing with viruses, they'v been doing it for a long time, some secretively, yet there's still no cu for
    any virus, and very few viruses have a vaccine.

    Depends on what you mean by "cure." If you visit your local cemetary,
    you will find a lot of young child and baby graves from before the
    1900s, and likely quite a few less from after. Why? Because of
    vaccines. Polio, Smallpox, Diptheria, etc., didn't just go away on
    their own.

    There's no injectable cure for anything, so my point is there's no vaccine effective enough that it warrants the intentional mutation (and lab leak) of SARS viruses. And I can't find any reports of vaccines being produced by biolabs. The vaccines are being produced by pharmaceutical companies.

    Since I haven't seen the biolabs produce any vaccines, and since I have seen the damage that intentional virus mutation causes, that's how I draw the conclusion that the biolabs serve nothing but nefarious purposes.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Mon Feb 17 07:20:05 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    That's what I mean. I wonder a lot about other potential lies that
    we're falling for. It could be things that are right under our noses,
    but we might not figure it out fast enough.

    That's why Elon is dismantling their funding. Most of the media companies er... propagdan ministries... are being propped up somehow. We already know about USAID funding Politico.

    Take away the money, and they collapse. When they are gone, there will be less propaganda and censorship, the more truth will come out.


    ... Worth seeing? Yes, but not worth going to see.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Mon Feb 17 07:20:05 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-

    There's no injectable cure for anything, so my point is there's no
    vaccine effective enough

    No "vaccine" exists. There are things that they call "vaccines" but they don't protect like they claim.

    Since I haven't seen the biolabs produce any vaccines, and since I have seen the damage that intentional virus mutation causes, that's how I
    draw the conclusion that the biolabs serve nothing but nefarious
    purposes.

    All of virology has been debunked. There is no scientific evidence of viruses causing disease, nor being transmittable.

    Now that raises a bigger question: What are these "biolabs" producing? Because they are doing something that is making people sick.


    ... An idea is not responsible for fools who believe in it.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Mon Feb 17 08:50:00 2025
    Depends on what you mean by "cure." If you visit your local cemetary, you will find a lot of young child and baby graves from before the 1900s, and likely quite a few less from after. Why? Because of vaccines. Polio, Smallpox, Diptheria, etc., didn't just go away on their own.

    There's no injectable cure for anything, so my point is there's no vaccine effective enough that it warrants the intentional mutation (and lab leak) of SARS viruses. And I can't find any reports of vaccines being produced by biolabs. The vaccines are being produced by pharmaceutical companies.

    Where do you think the testing for these vaccines, that the companies are producing, happens?

    I agree that biolabs shouldn't be intentional mutating viruses for any end other than disease prevention.

    Since I haven't seen the biolabs produce any vaccines, and since I have seen the damage that intentional virus mutation causes, that's how I draw the conclusion that the biolabs serve nothing but nefarious purposes.

    Where do you think the testing for these vaccines, that the companies are producing, happens?


    * SLMR 2.1a * Never draw fire, it irritates everyone around you.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to Ron L. on Mon Feb 17 10:03:29 2025
    Ron L. wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-

    That's why Elon is dismantling their funding. Most of the media
    companies er... propagdan ministries... are being propped up somehow.
    We already know about USAID funding Politico.

    Some clarity here -

    USAID paid $24,000 for subscriptions to their news service. Politico
    Pro made over $100 million in 2023. They have denied any subsidies from
    the US government.

    Across ALL of the US government, subscriptions totalled $8 million -
    again, a small proportion of Politico's revenues and certainly not
    propping up their business.

    Trump's press secretary, I'm sure was unintentionally vague when she
    said on 2/5:

    "I was made aware of the funding from USAID to media outlets, including Politico, who I know has a seat in this room. I can confirm that the
    more than 8 million taxpayer dollars that have gone to essentially
    subsidize subscriptions to Politico on the American taxpayers' dime will
    no longer be happening."

    It would be easy to confuse spending across the entire federal
    government with one organization under scrutiny, based on her words.
    But, even so, $8 million out of over $100 million in revenues is a drop
    in the proverbial bucket.

    I hope this clears things up.



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Ron L. on Mon Feb 17 11:59:34 2025
    That's what I mean. I wonder a lot about other potential lies that we're falling for. It could be things that are right under our noses, but we might not figure it out fast enough.

    That's why Elon is dismantling their funding. Most of the media
    companies er... propagdan ministries... are being propped up somehow.
    We already know about USAID funding Politico.

    From what I understand, PBS is 1/2 funded by private organizations, but the other 1/2 is funded by taxpayers. I hope that stops with this administration. That channel is 90% propaganda.

    I'm realizing now how messed up it is when they say "Brought to you in part by...<name of some globalist company>"

    They should be saying "Brought to you in part by... YOU the taxpayer. Thanks for giving us the money to spew propaganda at your kids."

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Mon Feb 17 12:14:38 2025
    Since I haven't seen the biolabs produce any vaccines, and since I have the damage that intentional virus mutation causes, that's how I draw the conclusion that the biolabs serve nothing but nefarious purposes.

    Where do you think the testing for these vaccines, that the companies are producing, happens?

    I assumed that they'd conduct their research in their own dedicated research centers. The thought of my prescription meds being invented in a secretive Chinese university lab had never occurred to me.

    All these fun facts that came to light after the scamdemic have turned me into a skeptic of everything, and especially of products coming from big brands.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Tue Feb 18 07:28:30 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    From what I understand, PBS is 1/2 funded by private organizations, but the other 1/2 is funded by taxpayers. I hope that stops with this administration. That channel is 90% propaganda.

    There's been pushes for defunding PBS for a long time now. But I think this time it will happen.

    I remember watching shows on PBS that were really nice. Then I moved to another area and the PBS shows were awful. One of my co-workers who had been around for a long time told me "they only put the good shows on at donation time." He said that the Leftie running the local PBS mainly just put on shows that SHE liked.

    It's long past time for PBS to start listenng to the market.


    ... Blessed are the meek, for they make great scapegoats.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to Ron L. on Tue Feb 18 06:45:35 2025
    Ron L. wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-

    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    From what I understand, PBS is 1/2 funded by private organizations, but the other 1/2 is funded by taxpayers. I hope that stops with this administration. That channel is 90% propaganda.

    It's more like 15%, and I'm sure many disagree with your assessment of
    their content - myself included.

    It's long past time for PBS to start listenng to the market.

    PBS is a non-profit organization meant to be an alternative to
    market-driven broadcast radio and TV.



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to KURT WEISKE on Wed Feb 19 10:05:00 2025
    From what I understand, PBS is 1/2 funded by private organizations, but the other 1/2 is funded by taxpayers. I hope that stops with this administration. That channel is 90% propaganda.

    It's more like 15%, and I'm sure many disagree with your assessment of
    their content - myself included.

    Until 2016 I would have disagreed completely. With the reaction of one of their then-anchors on a night shortly after the election, I have to agree
    that they employ at least one likely propaganda source. I used to watch
    their news almost every night. Now, I don't think I have tuned in intentionally at all for the past 8+ years.

    I wasn't watching but if one of their anchors had the same reaction to
    Biden's win in 2020, I would have felt the same way. PBS isn't MSNBC or FOX and they need not act like it.

    It's long past time for PBS to start listenng to the market.

    PBS is a non-profit organization meant to be an alternative to
    market-driven broadcast radio and TV.

    And I am overall glad we have it. If we didn't have it, I would miss a lot
    of shows that are not nearly as "brain-drainy" as what is on the major and cable networks.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Mistress: halfway between a mister and a mattress.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Novedades:

Servidor de Quake 3 Arena Online! - Conectate a ferchobbs.ddns.net, puerto 27960 y vence con tu equipo!