Been a while since the last count, so here it is ...
Z1 298
Z2 528
Z3 19
Z4 23
These are unique sysop-names, not the number of nodes.
Depending on the counting method it may be off a few nodes, but nothing which would change this reality dramatically.
My guess is that even in those numbers there's a pile of dead wood ...
What was the previous count?
12MAY19 05JUL22 12AUG22 29SEP22 12NOV22
Z1 302 298 307 304 304
Z2 571 528 509 493 490
Z3 24 19 21 20 22
Z4 18 23 21 21 21
Zone 1 has 346 sysops.
Hold 6
Down 25
Terry_Barlow 15
Tj_Barlow 8
New_SysOp 4
Nobody 3
new_sysop 3
New_Fido_SysOp 20
Bjorn_Felten 4
The last entry doesn't show up, because one of the letters in my name
is replaced somewhere on the line ('allow8bit 0' in MAKENL.CTL).
Running a script gives false information ... An example ...
Zone 1 has 346 sysops.
Hold 6
Down 25
Hold and Down are thrown out ... that reduces the number already to 315.
Then we have doubles such as
Terry_Barlow 15
Tj_Barlow 8
Same person
New_SysOp 4
Nobody 3
new_sysop 3
New_Fido_SysOp 20
There's a Geoff and Geoffrey or Jeff somewhere.
Plus I'm aware of identical people running several entries with
different names and getting away with it. That goes for Z2 as well.
The fact is that my counting is very conservative because there are
many non-node entries in the nodelist ... and dead wood. The reality
is a lot worse.
Plus the nodelist is full of nonsense ... check the latest Z2DAILY and
you will find 300 new entries with "New_Sysop" in a particular net.
Stas Mishchenkov wrote to Ward Dossche <=-
Plus the nodelist is full of nonsense ... check the latest Z2DAILY and
you will find 300 new entries with "New_Sysop" in a particular net.
What is the purpose of such lines in the nodelist?
you will find 300 new entries with "New_Sysop" in a particular net.
What is the purpose of such lines in the nodelist?
According to P4, in order to join Fidonet, you're supposed to set your mailer to use a /9999 address in your region and send a netmail application to the RC - it's a way of proving that you're capable of running a mailer.
I've had some of the new nodes in my region send netmail, the others
came through an email sent by a web page application. I'd say 25% of
the web/email applicants never poll for their first packet.
The question was: What is the purpose of such lines in the *NODELIST*?
The question was: What is the purpose of such lines in the
*NODELIST*?
Good question. The simple answer is: *absolutely* *none*. In fact
it's counter productive, and can cause all sorts of problems.
The question was: What is the purpose of such lines in the *NODELIST*?
Good question. The simple answer is: *absolutely* *none*. In fact it's counter productive, and can cause all sorts of problems.
When all of that stops and/or you and some others make your grand-departures, maybe the entries will be removed.
When all of that stops and/or you and some others make your grand-departures, maybe the entries will be removed.
You are aware there are such "new sysop" nodes as well in Z2 and Z4?
The question was: What is the purpose of such lines in the
*NODELIST*?
Good question. The simple answer is: *absolutely* *none*. In fact it's counter productive, and can cause all sorts of problems.
The question was: What is the purpose of such lines in the
*NODELIST*?
Good question. The simple answer is: *absolutely* *none*. In fact
it's counter productive, and can cause all sorts of problems.
Can anyone disagree with this? I would like to hear for what purpose such lines were placed in the nodelist.
Can anyone disagree with this? I would like to hear for what purpose
such lines were placed in the nodelist.
Because I can.
Because I can.
WOW! Famous words of <insert dictator name>.
Sysop: | Fercho |
---|---|
Lugar: | La Plata, Buenos Aires |
Usuarios: | 33 |
Nodos: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 03:25:11 |
Llamadas: | 119 |
Archivoss: | 15,607 |
Mensajes: | 32,807 |