The simplest fix is to not create empty PATH lines at all (with or
without space)! ;-)
Is /not/ creating a PATH kludge covered anywhere in the holy grail of documented standards and/or proposals?
So far, all that has been pointed out is a document that shows the proper format of the PATH kludge.
Is /not/ creating a PATH kludge covered anywhere in the holy grail of documented standards and/or proposals?
 > A bug report (at gitlab.synchro.net) would've been nice to have. :-)
Sorry, I intended to... O:-)
Next time. :-)
There'll certainly more opportunities (bugs created/found) in the
future. lol
@MSGID: 72.fidonet_fidotest@2:341/234.5885 2da17d3c
@REPLY: 15424.fidotest@1:103/705 2da0aec8
@PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Win32 master/d27b45adf Dec 12 2025 MSC 1944
@TZUTC: 0100
@TID: SBBSecho 3.33-Win32 master/d27b45adf Dec 12 2025 MSC 1944
@BBSID: CYBNOT
@CHRS: UTF-8 4
@FORMAT: flowed
@NOTE: Mozilla Thunderbird
11/12/2025 22:50, Rob Swindell (1:103/705):
… > A bug report (at gitlab.synchro.net) would've been nice to have. :-)
Sorry, I intended to... O:-)
Next time. :-)
There'll certainly more opportunities (bugs created/found) in the
future. lol
Sure ;-)
I've just upgraded my Synchronet point to the dev version. This message should go out without that empty PATH kludge.
Carlos
--- SBBSecho 3.33-Win32
* Origin: cyb synchronet point (2:341/234.5885)
SEEN-BY: 103/705 124/5016 153/757 154/10 30 203/0 221/0 6 240/1120 5832 SEEN-BY: 263/1 280/464 5003 5006 5555 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 341/66 SEEN-BY: 341/234 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 5020/400 @PATH: 341/234 280/464
@TZUTC: 0100
@MSGID: 72.fidonet_fidotest@2:341/234.5885 2da17d3c
@REPLY: 15424.fidotest@1:103/705 2da0aec8
@PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Win32 master/d27b45adf Dec 12 2025 MSC 1944
@TID: SBBSecho 3.33-Win32 master/d27b45adf Dec 12 2025 MSC 1944
@BBSID: CYBNOT
@CHRS: UTF-8 4
@FORMAT: flowed
@NOTE: Mozilla Thunderbird
11/12/2025 22:50, Rob Swindell (1:103/705):
 > A bug report (at gitlab.synchro.net) would've been nice tohave. :-)
Sorry, I intended to... O:-)
Next time. :-)
There'll certainly more opportunities (bugs created/found) in the
future. lol
Sure ;-)
I've just upgraded my Synchronet point to the dev version. This
message should go out without that empty PATH kludge.
Carlos
--- SBBSecho 3.33-Win32
* Origin: cyb synchronet point (2:341/234.5885)
SEEN-BY: 221/6 280/464 341/66 234
@PATH: 341/234
I've just upgraded my Synchronet point to the dev version. This
message should go out without that empty PATH kludge.
Confirmed! ;-)
I've just upgraded my Synchronet point to the dev version. This
message should go out without that empty PATH kludge.
Yep!
I've just upgraded my Synchronet point to the dev version. This
message should go out without that empty PATH kludge.
Yep!
But your tosser removed it anyway, didn't it?
You'd have to check the PKT my node sent to you... (No need to, I've already done)
I've just upgraded my Synchronet point to the dev version. This message should go out without that empty PATH kludge.
Confirmed! ;-)
As a point, should it send no PATH kludge at all then?
Not sure what is correct. Some tossers and point packages do, while
others don't.
I would imagine an empty PATH kludge would be better than inserting
the bossnode's 2D address *before* it gets to the bossnode!
I've checked .PKT's from several points I'm using or have tested.
Well done on the testing! You're absolutely killing it lately. ;)
These don't insert a PATH kludge:
- Winpoint
- OpenXP
- Crashmail II
- FMail (default, but can be enabled)
These insert a PATH kludge (including the bossnode's 2D address):
- HotdogEd
- Aftershock
- D'Bridge
Do messages coming from these display at the boss node if it's address
is already in the PATH?
Or do they get forwarded on without being stored in the message base?
So on top of the message where all the regular kludge lines are?
Yes, see here:
https://www.cyberiada.org/fido/tmpfiles/fidotest-sbbs-point-snaps
hot.png
It kind of makes sense, because the "^APATH:" line without the <space> after the ':' is just a kludge line. So I can see the logic in placing
it on top with the other kludge lines.
Not sure what is correct. Some tossers and point packages do, while
others don't.
Is there a way you could edit the raw message that Synchronet creates,
and add a space to the PATH kludge before it gets sent off to FMail?
This way, if FMail appends to that line, rather than creating a new
one and leaving the original alone,
we know this should be the fix, and can report it to Rob.
So on top of the message where all the regular kludge lines are?
Yes, see here:
https://www.cyberiada.org/fido/tmpfiles/fidotest-sbbs-point-snaps
hot.png
It kind of makes sense, because the "^APATH:" line without the <space>
after the ':' is just a kludge line. So I can see the logic in placing
it on top with the other kludge lines.
Yes.
BTW, did you check if you can also see that in GoldED, like in the screenshot?
Or do they get forwarded on without being stored in the message base?
They are stored and also get forwarded. This has never been an issue,
IIRC.
Hmm... IMO that would be more of a workaround than a fix. I think it would be better to just not add an empty PATH kludge.
This issue has now been addressed:
A bug report (at gitlab.synchro.net) would've been nice to have. :-)
A bug report (at gitlab.synchro.net) would've been nice to have. :-)
Sorry, I intended to... O:-)
I sure did before reporting. :)
@CHRS: UTF-8 4
@TZUTC: -0800
@MSGID: 1:153/150 EC5BF23F
@MAILER: BinktermPHP 1.8.5 Linux
test
... Remind me again how lucky I am to work here
--- BinktermPHP v1.8.5
* Origin: Claude's BBS - https://claudes.lovelybits.org (1:153/150) SEEN-BY: 19/10 30/0 134/100 101 153/135 143 148 149 150 151 153 757
7083
SEEN-BY: 154/10 201/0 218/840 221/1 6 360 240/502 1120 1634 8002 8005
8010
SEEN-BY: 240/8050 280/464 5003 5555 292/854 301/1 313/41 320/119 219 335/364
SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 342/11 371/0 52 382/200 423/81 460/58 492/0
530/204
SEEN-BY: 550/278 3634/12 5020/1042
@PATH: 153/150 757 221/6 1 240/1120 371/0
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
testing beta version of px/wins
@TID: PX/Win v7.0 PX28-1176M
@MSGID: 1:261/20 7e04d7a8
@TZUTC: -0500
testing internet rex and pxw config change.
... It wasn't my fault your wife wandered into my house!
--- Wildcat! v10.0.500.1 (Oct 16 2025), Editor Mod v1.7
* Origin: Over The Brink * Grand Island, NY USA *| brinkbbs.org (1:261/20)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 100 16/0 19/36 37 30/0 123/130 134/101 142/104 799 201/0 203/0
SEEN-BY: 221/0 1 6 229/426 240/502 1120 1634 5832 8002 8005 8010 8050 261/20
SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 5555 292/854 301/1 313/41 320/119 219 319 2119 322/762
SEEN-BY: 325/304 335/364 342/19 371/0 52 382/200 423/81 492/0 530/204 550/278
@PATH: 261/20 320/219 221/1 240/1120 371/0
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
@TID: PX/Win v7.0 PX28-1176M
@MSGID: 1:261/20 13a4d09d
@TZUTC: -0500
testing beta version of px/wins
... If she can't take the heat, get her out of the oven!
--- Wildcat! v10.0.500.1 (Oct 16 2025), Editor Mod v1.7
* Origin: Over The Brink * Grand Island, NY USA *| brinkbbs.org (1:261/20)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 100 16/0 19/36 37 30/0 123/130 134/101 142/104 799 201/0 203/0
SEEN-BY: 221/0 1 6 229/426 240/502 1120 1634 5832 8002 8005 8010 8050 261/20
SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 5555 292/854 301/1 313/41 320/119 219 319 2119 322/762
SEEN-BY: 325/304 335/364 342/19 371/0 52 382/200 423/81 492/0 530/204 550/278
@PATH: 261/20 320/219 221/1 240/1120 371/0
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
@TID: PX/Win v7.0 PX28-1176M
@MSGID: 1:261/20 41cc8b4d
@TZUTC: -0500
testing
... The man who dies with the most toys is dead..
--- Wildcat! v10.0.500.1 (Oct 16 2025), Editor Mod v1.7
* Origin: Over The Brink * Grand Island, NY USA *| brinkbbs.org (1:261/20)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 100 16/0 19/36 37 30/0 123/130 134/101 142/104 799 201/0 203/0
SEEN-BY: 221/0 1 6 229/426 240/502 1120 1634 5832 8002 8005 8010 8050 261/20
SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 5555 292/854 301/1 313/41 320/119 219 319 2119 322/762
SEEN-BY: 325/304 335/364 342/19 371/0 52 382/200 423/81 492/0 530/204 550/278
@PATH: 261/20 320/219 221/1 240/1120 371/0
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
test
@TID: PX/Win v10.0 PX28-1176M
@MSGID: 1:261/20 859f55c2
@TZUTC: -0400
testing posting via thunderbird and nntp
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v10.0
* Origin: Over The Brink * Grand Island, NY USA *| brinkbbs.org (1:261/20)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 100 16/0 19/36 37 30/0 123/130 134/101 142/104 799 201/0 203/0
SEEN-BY: 221/0 1 6 229/426 240/502 1120 1634 5832 8002 8005 8010 8050 261/20
SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 5555 292/854 301/1 313/41 320/119 219 319 2119 322/762
SEEN-BY: 325/304 335/364 342/19 371/0 52 382/200 423/81 492/0 530/204 550/278
@PATH: 261/20 320/219 221/1 240/1120 371/0
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
testing posting via thunderbird and nntp
testing posting via thunderbird and nntp
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v10.0
* Origin: Over The Brink * Grand Island, NY USA *| brinkbbs.org
(1:261/20)
If this is a test regarding all of the headers that used to be posted in you
NNTP messages, then the test passed!
unfortunately, no it wasn't.
Hey Robert!wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2026 07:36:32 -0400, you
you were trying to do.unfortunately, no it wasn't.
Then, I suppose I didn't understand what
You said something in the lines of"testing Thunderbird and NNTP". Your
message didn't include all of thoseheaders. Maybe that only happens
when you reply to another message? Idon't know.
Regards,is illegal.
Nick
... Sarcasm: because beating people up
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20260304telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)
* Origin: _thePharcyde
Thank you, because I kept getting messages
from people saying they saw nntp headers in
the body of messages I post via newsreader.
Apparently some tossers filter that out in
import better than others
Thank you, because I kept getting messages
from people saying they saw nntp headers in
the body of messages I post via newsreader.
Apparently some tossers filter that out in
import better than others
FWIW, apparently both sbbsecho (synchronet) and hpt are filtering
them out.
Hey Mike!
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:04:56 -0500, you wrote:
> FWIW, apparently both sbbsecho (synchronet) and hpt are filtering
> them out.
Not sure about that, or I probably wouldn't have seen them in the first place (I use both of what you mention above here, and hpt hasn't been updated since 2024; nor did I change any settings).
Granted, maybe it only includes those headers in the message body when he replies (followup) to a message via NNTP, rather than just posting a new one.
Regards,
Nick
.. Sarcasm: because beating people up is illegal.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20260304
* Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
Hey Robert!
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:39:24 -0400, you wrote:
> Thank you, because I kept getting messages
> from people saying they saw nntp headers in
> the body of messages I post via newsreader.
I was one of them that saw those headers, and wrote to you about it.
> Apparently some tossers filter that out in
> import better than others
Are you sure you didn't adjust Thunderbird to NOT write headers to the message
body?
Were you using the "Reply" button, rather than "Follow-Up"?
I doubt it was a "some tossers" issue, as your last couple of tests via Thunderbird haven't had the headers in the bodies.
Hey Robert!
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:39:24 -0400, you wrote:
> Thank you, because I kept getting messages
> from people saying they saw nntp headers in
> the body of messages I post via newsreader.
I was one of them that saw those headers, and wrote to you about it.
> Apparently some tossers filter that out in
> import better than others
Are you sure you didn't adjust Thunderbird to NOT write headers to the message
body?
Were you using the "Reply" button, rather than "Follow-Up"?
I doubt it was a "some tossers" issue, as your last couple of tests via Thunderbird haven't had the headers in the bodies.
On 3/16/2026 10:57 AM, Nick Boel wrote:
Hey Mike!
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:04:56 -0500, you wrote:
> FWIW, apparently both sbbsecho (synchronet) and hpt are filtering
> them out.
Not sure about that, or I probably wouldn't have seen them in the
first place (I use both of what you mention above here, and hpt hasn't
been updated since
2024; nor did I change any settings).
Granted, maybe it only includes those headers in the message body when
he replies (followup) to a message via NNTP, rather than just posting
a new one.
Regards,
Nick
.. Sarcasm: because beating people up is illegal.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20260304
* Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)
(1:154/10)
Let's try this one. I have ent santronicsa message regarding this.
They are pretty receptive to feedback After all, they are adding binkp
to their front end mailer product after all these years.
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v10.0
* Origin: Over The Brink * Grand Island, NY USA *| brinkbbs.org
(1:261/20)
This is how your message was received here (without one quote level, of course). Looks much better as far as quoting is concerned.
Was this done with Thunderbird? Or your BBS message editor?
Granted, maybe it only includes those headers in the message body when he replies (followup) to a message via NNTP, rather than just posting a new one.
This is how your message was received here (without one quote level, of course). Looks much better as far as quoting is concerned.
Was this done with Thunderbird? Or your BBS message editor?
This is how your message was
received here (without one quote
level, of course). Looks much
better as far as quoting is
concerned.
Was this done with Thunderbird? O
your BBS message editor?
This message was wriiten while logge
into my bbs. Wildcat! always
uses "->" when quoting.
... Life is short, eat dessert first
headers in the message body when heGranted, maybe it only includes those
rather than just posting a newreplies (followup) to a message via NNTP,
one.
That could be!
Mike
headers in the message body when heGranted, maybe it only includes those
rather than just posting a newreplies (followup) to a message via NNTP,
one.
That could be!
Mike
The good news is that I brought this to
Santronics' attention and they are going to
put the issue in a parallel bug fix for
px/wins and the wcqwk.exe qwk echomail
processor.
Can they also fix the "-> " quoting style? ;-)
Granted, maybe it only includes those headers in the message body when he replies (followup) to a message via NNTP, rather than just posting a new o
That could be!
The good news is that I brought this to
Santronics' attention and they are going to
put the issue in a parallel bug fix for
px/wins and the wcqwk.exe qwk echomail
processor.
Can they also fix the "-> " quoting style? ;-)
Can they also fix the "-> " quoting style? ;-)
why. its been that way since wildcat 2.xx
Can they also fix the "-> " quoting style? ;-)
why. its been that way since wildcat 2.xx
Because it's always been done wrong, doesn't make it right! ;-)
It doesn't follow the accepted and documented standard: http://ftsc.org/docs/fsc-0032.001
So other editors don't recognise this as a quoted line, so subsequent quotes become a mess as shown above...
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
Can they also fix the "-> " quoting style? ;-)
I think I could fix that directly, if I wanted to. I just need to ask if its in the editor WCC code anywhere.
I brought this up with hector and he is going to see if he can work a
fix for this into the .2 alpha cycle :)
Can they also fix the "-> " quoting style? ;-)
why. its been that way since wildcat 2.xx
So other editors don't recognise this as a quoted line, so
subsequent quotes become a mess as shown above...
Because it's always been done wrong, doesn't make it right! ;-)
It doesn't follow the accepted and documented standard: http://ftsc.org/docs/fsc-0032.001
So other editors don't recognise this as a quoted line, so subsequent quotes
become a mess as shown above...
going to see if he can work aI brought this up with hector and he is
get it figured out and fixed forfix for this into the .2 alpha cycle :)
Excellent news. Hope they are able to
you.
Mike
--- GTMail 1.26moetiki.ddns.net:27
* Origin: moe's * 1+5028758938 3-9600 *
(1:2320/195.0)
Can they also fix the "-> " quoting style? ;-)
why. its been that way since wildcat 2.xx
So other editors don't recognise this as a quoted line, so
subsequent quotes become a mess as shown above...
It is not coming across as a mess here?
abcde fghij klmnop qrstuv wxyz abcde fghij klmnop qrstuv wxyz abcde fghij klmnop qrstuv wxyz
abcde fghij klmnop qrstuv wxyz abcde fghij klmnop qrstuv wxyz abcdefghij klmnop qrstuv wxyz
abcde fghij klmnop qrstuv wxyz abcde fghij klmnop qrstuv wxyz abcdefghij klmnop qrstuv wxyz
wxyz abcde -> RW> fghij klmnop qrstuv wxyzabcde fghij klmnop qrstuv wxyz abcde fghij klmnop qrstuv
Because it's always been done wrong, doesn't make it right! ;-)
It doesn't follow the accepted and documented standard: http://ftsc.org/docs/fsc-0032.001
So other editors don't recognise this as a quoted line, so subsequentquotes -> become a mess as shown above...
other standards have been updated, why can't this one.
But to keep you happy, I've reported this to Santronics.
wxyz abcde -> RW> fghij klmnop qrstuv wxyzabcde fghij klmnop qrstuv wxyz abcde fghij klmnop qrstuv
Etc... It's no longer clear who said what.
Can they also fix the "-> " quoting style? ;-)
It doesn't follow the accepted and documented standard: http://ftsc.org/docs/fsc-0032.001
So other editors don't recognise this as a quoted line, sosubsequent quotes -> become a mess as shown above...
other standards have been updated, why can't this one. And as far as
I can tell you seem to be the only one PMSing about it. But to keep
you happy, I've reported this to Santronics. And it's off that
PCBoard used a similar quoting style and life went on.
--- GTMail 1.26moetiki.ddns.net:27
* Origin: moe's * 1+5028758938 3-9600 *
(1:2320/195.0)
if they fix it, they fix it. Right now,
something that minor is the least of their
worries. Right now they are more focused on
getting their front end mailer updated with
binkp as their paying customers
(including me) have been needing for years --
proper binkp support in Platinum Xpress. you
know the saying "Money talks."
Hello Robert!
18 Mar 26 10:31, you wrote to Mike Powell:
MP>> --- GTMail 1.26
MP>> * Origin: moe's * 1+5028758938 3-9600 *
RW> moetiki.ddns.net:27
MP>> (1:2320/195.0)
RW> if they fix it, they fix it. Right now,
RW> something that minor is the least of their
RW> worries. Right now they are more focused on
RW> getting their front end mailer updated with
RW> binkp as their paying customers
RW> (including me) have been needing for years --
RW> proper binkp support in Platinum Xpress. you
RW> know the saying "Money talks."
This is your next message. Notice how it's got no line flow and looks like it's
stuck at 40 characters or did you press enter at
that mark. Either way it looks strange.
Hello Robert!
18 Mar 26 08:26, you wrote to Wilfred Van Velzen:
RW> -> So other editors don't recognise this as a quoted line, so
RW> subsequent quotes -> become a mess as shown above...
RW> other standards have been updated, why can't this one. And as far as
RW> I can tell you seem to be the only one PMSing about it. But to keep
RW> you happy, I've reported this to Santronics. And it's off that
RW> PCBoard used a similar quoting style and life went on.
Some of your messages like this one come out looking fine, and go past what looks like a 40 character limit.
I'm going to quote your next message, and it will look like it was cut at that
limit.
On 3/16/2026 10:52 AM, Nick Boel wrote:
Hey Robert!
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:39:24 -0400, you wrote:
> Thank you, because I kept getting messages
> from people saying they saw nntp headers in
> the body of messages I post via newsreader.
I was one of them that saw those headers, and wrote to you about it.
> Apparently some tossers filter that out in
> import better than others
Are you sure you didn't adjust Thunderbird to NOT write headers to the message
body?
Were you using the "Reply" button, rather than "Follow-Up"?
I doubt it was a "some tossers" issue, as your last couple of tests via
Thunderbird haven't had the headers in the bodies.
tbh, i don't know how to do that. as long as the mailer part works,
thats all im concerned about.
Hello Robert!
18 Mar 26 08:26, you wrote to Wilfred Van Velzen:
RW> -> So other editors don't recognise this as a quoted line, so
RW> subsequent quotes -> become a mess as shown above...
RW> other standards have been updated, why can't this one. And as far as
RW> I can tell you seem to be the only one PMSing about it. But to keep
RW> you happy, I've reported this to Santronics. And it's off that
RW> PCBoard used a similar quoting style and life went on.
Some of your messages like this one come out looking fine, and go past what looks like a 40 character limit.
I'm going to quote your next message, and it will look like it was cut at that
limit.
On 3/16/2026 10:52 AM, Nick Boel wrote:
Hey Robert!
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:39:24 -0400, you wrote:
> Thank you, because I kept getting messages
> from people saying they saw nntp headers in
> the body of messages I post via newsreader.
I was one of them that saw those headers, and wrote to you about it.
> Apparently some tossers filter that out in
> import better than others
Are you sure you didn't adjust Thunderbird to NOT write headers to the message
body?
Were you using the "Reply" button, rather than "Follow-Up"?
I doubt it was a "some tossers" issue, as your last couple of tests via
Thunderbird haven't had the headers in the bodies.
tbh, i don't know how to do that. as long as the mailer part works,
thats all im concerned about.
if they fix it, they fix it. Right now,
something that minor is the least of their
worries. Right now they are more focused on
getting their front end mailer updated with
binkp as their paying customers
(including me) have been needing for years --
proper binkp support in Platinum Xpress. you
know the saying "Money talks."
This is your next message. Notice how it's got no line flow and looks like i
stuck at 40 characters or did you press enter at
that mark. Either way it looks strange.
Again, large font in my offline message editor so I can actually see
what I'm typing even with glasses. Methinks allthese years of
running a BBS have ruined my eyesight. Do us a favor and don't get
old. :)
You are not that old. I wear glasse
now, whatever if you can't see with
them maybe you need to see the eye d
again?
Robert Wolfe wrote in a message to Stephen Walsh:
Again, large font in my offline message editor so I can actually see what I'm typing even with glasses. Methinks allthese years of
running a BBS have ruined my eyesight. Do us a favor and don't get old. :)
You are not that old. I wear glasses now, whatever if you can't see
with them maybe you need to see the eye doc again?
P.S. I have a modern working message tosser I normally use (HPT) but when posting here I like to use old broken software to make the people who
care INSANE.
You never know. When I did residential
IT, I had a 96 year old customer who
used an electric magnifying glass
pressed directly to the screen to use
AOL mail scaled up to the point where
only three characters were visible on
screen at a time. I feel at that point
you probably ought to get specialized
software, but good luck training a
lady in her 90s.
@MSGID: 1:229/452.0 9bd73f80
@REPLY: 1:261/20 8198d7ac
@PID: timEd 1.10.y2k+
@TAGID: Tag-O-Matic V.13F Reg'd 5a5
@TID: FastEcho 1.46.1 10510
P.S. I have a modern working message tosser I normally use (HPT) but
when posting here I like to use old broken software to make the people
who care INSANE.
You are not that old. I wear glasses now, whatever if you can't see with th
maybe you need to see the eye doc again?
P.S. I have a modern working message tosser I normally use (HPT) but when posting here I like to use old broken software to make the people who care INSANE.
sad most of that old software will remain fixed in time.. it's nice to have options
sad most of that old software will remain fixed in time.. it's nice to
have options
Yeah but the good thing is is Santronics is back to active work onWINS
and PX. They even have a working WC4 system running it seems :)
Indeed your message has no TZUTC kludge! :-(
Indeed your message has no TZUTC kludge! :-(
If I could strip everything I would. I mean I use 30 year old software and it can deal with that, but for some reason new software can't?
This is your next message. Notice how it's got no line flow andlooks like i -> stuck at 40 characters or did you press enter at ->
that mark. Either way it looks strange.
Again, large font in my offline message editor so I can actually see
what I'm typing even with glasses. Methinks allthese years of running
a BBS have ruined my eyesight. Do us a favor and don't get old. :)
screen at a time. I feel at that point
you probably ought to get specialized
software, but good luck training a
lady in her 90s.
It would be nice if they at least supported the REPLY kludge...(FTS-0009)
It would be nice if they at least supported the REPLY kludge...
(FTS-0009)
It is what it is. AT LEAST THEY ARE STILL DEVELOPING ANDSUPPORTING THE PRODUCTS.
It would be nice if they at least supported the REPLY kludge...It is what it is. AT LEAST THEY ARE STILL DEVELOPING
ANDSUPPORTING THE PRODUCTS.
Is that like trying to train a cat?
@PID: Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
Ok, no need to be upset. It's good that they are developing their products.
It was just a suggestion to improve their support for Fidonet.
@PID: Hotdoged/2.13.5/Androidfwiw, I've been trying for days to remember the name of this
now.:)
Ok, no need to be upset. It's good that they are developing theirI know. I can probably change the quote character since I own a PlusPack license. I just have to find where in the source it's located.
products. It was just a suggestion to improve their support for
Fidonet.
Hello, Robert Wolfe.remember the name of this
On 21/3/26 20:09 you wrote:
@PID: Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
fwiw, I've been trying for days to
love it!now.:)
You mean HotdogEd? It's a great app, I
they are developing theirOk, no need to be upset. It's good that
improve their support forproducts. It was just a suggestion to
quote character since I own aFidonet.
I know. I can probably change the
where in the source it'sPlusPack license. I just have to find
talking about the missing REPLYlocated.
I didn't mean the quoting style... I was
control line.for it. Do the developers read
It would be good if they added support
the Wildcat echo or others? Any otherway to contact them?
| Sysop: | Fercho |
|---|---|
| Lugar: | La Plata, Buenos Aires |
| Usuarios: | 23 |
| Nodos: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 153:00:50 |
| Llamadas: | 136 |
| Archivoss: | 15,915 |
| Mensajes: | 39,965 |
Novedades:
Servidor de Quake 3 Arena Online! - Conectate a ferchobbs.ddns.net, puerto 27960 y vence con tu equipo!