Mike Powell wrote to All <=-

'I think we're going to have a human-level performance on most, if not all, professional tasks': Microsoft AI chief thinks AI will replace
most white-collar work in the 12 to 18 months - so is this the end for human workers?

The slope is increasing, but most of the doomsayers are saying something
more like 5 years for most jobs.

I'm sure the increased profits reaped by labor replacement with AI will
be turned into a universal income and we'll enter tech utopia. Right?

Right?




--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)

'I think we're going to have a human-level performance on most, if not all, professional tasks': Microsoft AI chief thinks AI will replace
most white-collar work in the 12 to 18 months - so is this the end for human workers?

The slope is increasing, but most of the doomsayers are saying something
more like 5 years for most jobs.

I'm sure the increased profits reaped by labor replacement with AI will
be turned into a universal income and we'll enter tech utopia. Right?

Right?

I would not hold my breath for that. Our only hopes of acheiving that
might be to become tech bros on our own.... if you cannot beat them...


* SLMR 2.1a * User: The hardest-to-setup PC peripheral you can buy.
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

So, how many employee's will be left at Redmond?

When you think about it, executive positions could most easily be
replaced by AI - when you have an AI that understands the current market
and future trends better than a human, there's no need for a CEO.

While I don't disagree, I don't see many CEO's and upper management wanting
to make such a decision.

There is a Twilight Zone episode that comes to mind here... the Brain
Center at Whipple's. Good episode. ;)

Mike


* SLMR 2.1a * Can you repeat the part after 'Listen very carefully'?
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

When you think about it, executive positions could most easily be

>> replaced by AI - when you have an AI that understands the current market
>> and future trends better than a human, there's no need for a CEO.

While I don't disagree, I don't see many CEO's and upper management

>wanting to make such a decision.

When I first read the above what popped into my mind Re: CEO's was
the Peter Principle, the idea that workers will continue to be
promoted if they do their jobs well, meaning that when they
finally stop promoting a person, it's because they have finally
reached the point where they can no longer handle the job they
are supposed to be doing..

IOW, all upper management is incompetent.. B)

---
* SLMR Rob * I'll let ya know when the other 2 of your wit gets here
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

Rob Mccart wrote to MIKE POWELL <=-

IOW, all upper management is incompetent.. B)

I worked at a a multimedia company, left in 1997. When I left, they had
about 400 employees. They ditched their multimedia roots and went all in
on internet authoring and animation. The company grew to 1800 people at
the peak, then after the bust, went through heavy layoffs to end up with
800 employees.

They made fuckedcompany.com because the new company had 80 vice
presidents. For a company of 800. 10 employees per VP. Just goes to
confirm that upper management is great at keeping themselves employed.



--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)

When you think about it, executive positions could most easily be

>> replaced by AI - when you have an AI that understands the current market
>> and future trends better than a human, there's no need for a CEO.

While I don't disagree, I don't see many CEO's and upper management

>wanting to make such a decision.

When I first read the above what popped into my mind Re: CEO's was
the Peter Principle, the idea that workers will continue to be
promoted if they do their jobs well, meaning that when they
finally stop promoting a person, it's because they have finally
reached the point where they can no longer handle the job they
are supposed to be doing..

IOW, all upper management is incompetent.. B)

Yeah, I have heard that many times and would agree that they are either (1) incompetent or (2) never really got to hand off the responsibilities of
their past job(s) and are therefore overwhelmed.

I think that second one usually happens not so much to people that get
promoted but maybe lateralled. ;)

Mike


* SLMR 2.1a * Groundwater. Do you mean crushed ice?
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

I worked at a a multimedia company, left in 1997. When I left, they had

>about 400 employees. They ditched their multimedia roots and went all in
>on internet authoring and animation. The company grew to 1800 people at
>the peak, then after the bust, went through heavy layoffs to end up with
>800 employees.

They made fuckedcompany.com because the new company had 80 vice

>presidents. For a company of 800. 10 employees per VP. Just goes to
>confirm that upper management is great at keeping themselves employed.

Yes, good example.. You also see quite often, especially in companies
that have some attachment to the gov't like Power or Mail systems,
that they have terrible losses due to bad management and yet the
top people are making many $Millions a year. Rarely do they ever
get rid of those people, and when they do, there is always a
severance package worth many more $Millions..

---
* SLMR Rob * I having BIG surprise for squirrel and moose
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

Yeah, I have heard that many times and would agree that they are either (1)

>incompetent or (2) never really got to hand off the responsibilities of
>their past job(s) and are therefore overwhelmed.

I think that second one usually happens not so much to people that get

>promoted but maybe lateralled. ;)

Yes, now that you mention it, my last regular job kept heapig more resposibility onto me, eventually the actual manager was almost never
in the building (out having 3 martini lunches with clients) so I
ended up doing his job as well as mine..

And I had to threaten to quit to get a decent raise out of them..

---
* SLMR Rob * I have read and understood the above. X______________
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

They made fuckedcompany.com because the new company had 80 vice

>presidents. For a company of 800. 10 employees per VP. Just goes to
>confirm that upper management is great at keeping themselves employed.

Yes, good example.. You also see quite often, especially in companies
that have some attachment to the gov't like Power or Mail systems,
that they have terrible losses due to bad management and yet the
top people are making many $Millions a year. Rarely do they ever
get rid of those people, and when they do, there is always a
severance package worth many more $Millions..

Living in California, Kurt probably knows several good examples regarding Pacific Gas and Electric (PGE).

Mike


* SLMR 2.1a * paranoia: believing this tagline is about you.
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

Mike Powell wrote to ROB MCCART <=-

Living in California, Kurt probably knows several good examples
regarding Pacific Gas and Electric (PGE).

Make stupid deals with Enron.
Enron manipulates the market, stupid deals bite PG&E in the ass.
PG&E transfers billions to PGE Corp, then files for bankrupcy.
Later, in better economic times, buy back the stock to raise prices.
Don't spend money on infrastructure maintenance.
Fires caused by faulty infrastructure causes millions in damages.
Petition the PUC to raise prices to pay for PR ad campaigns and
deferred maintenance (which should have been done instead of buying
back stock)
Encourage electric vehicles and solar buyback programs.
Increase EV rates and hamstring residential solar buyback rates.




... Adding on
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)

You also see quite often, especially in companies

>> that have some attachment to the gov't like Power or Mail systems,
>> that they have terrible losses due to bad management and yet the
>> top people are making many $Millions a year. Rarely do they ever
>> get rid of those people, and when they do, there is always a
>> severance package worth many more $Millions..

Living in California, Kurt probably knows several good examples regarding

>Pacific Gas and Electric (PGE).

Is that to suggest that the more 'Liberal' states are more likely to
have those sorts of problems? Thinking on this, I'm sure there are
a lot of more Conservative (Republican) States/Provinces that also
greatly over-pay the top business people, the main difference probably
being how they treat their lower income people.. B)

---
* SLMR Rob * If you use both hands is it group sex ???
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

Living in California, Kurt probably knows several good examples regarding Pacific Gas and Electric (PGE).

Make stupid deals with Enron.
Enron manipulates the market, stupid deals bite PG&E in the ass.
PG&E transfers billions to PGE Corp, then files for bankrupcy.
Later, in better economic times, buy back the stock to raise prices.
Don't spend money on infrastructure maintenance.
Fires caused by faulty infrastructure causes millions in damages.
Petition the PUC to raise prices to pay for PR ad campaigns and
deferred maintenance (which should have been done instead of buying
back stock)
Encourage electric vehicles and solar buyback programs.
Increase EV rates and hamstring residential solar buyback rates.

I knew I could count on you to fill in many details. I live in Kentucky,
far from California, but even I know there are stories to tell about them,
so you know it cannot be good. ;)

Mike


* SLMR 2.1a * Ever notice we park in driveways and drive on parkways?
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

Living in California, Kurt probably knows several good examples regarding

>Pacific Gas and Electric (PGE).

Is that to suggest that the more 'Liberal' states are more likely to
have those sorts of problems? Thinking on this, I'm sure there are
a lot of more Conservative (Republican) States/Provinces that also
greatly over-pay the top business people, the main difference probably
being how they treat their lower income people.. B)

No there was no real political inference there. The inference is that PG&E
has been bad enough about it that even someone that lives far away from California has heard about it. ;)

Mike


* SLMR 2.1a * OPCODE: MWAG = Make Wild-Assed Guess
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

Is that to suggest that the more 'Liberal' states are more likely to

>> have those sorts of problems?

No there was no real political inference there. The inference is that PG&E

>has been bad enough about it that even someone that lives far away from
>California has heard about it. ;)

I see.. We have a few provinces here that end up in the news for odd
reasons more than most others too..

Mostly Alberta and British Columbia.. One super Conservative and the
other super Liberal.. B)

---
* SLMR Rob * Flee at once, all is discovered !
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

I see.. We have a few provinces here that end up in the news for odd
reasons more than most others too..

Mostly Alberta and British Columbia.. One super Conservative and the
other super Liberal.. B)

LOL they wind up in the news here, too! :D Lately, one for a separatist movement and the other for out-of-control housing prices/cost of living.

Also, Alberta has made the news in recent past for an advertising ploy to attempt to convince British Columbians to move to Alberta, which used BC's out-of-control housing prices/cost of living as reasons to relocate. ;)

Mike

* SLMR 2.1a * Midget soothsayer robs bank! Small medium at large....
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

We have a few provinces here that end up in the news for odd

>> reasons more than most others too..

Mostly Alberta and British Columbia.. One super Conservative and the

>> other super Liberal.. B)

LOL they wind up in the news here, too! :D Lately, one for a separatist

>movement and the other for out-of-control housing prices/cost of living.

Depending on your source Vancouver, B.C. area has 1 or 2 of the most
expensive cities to live in Canada but Alberta also has 2. But Ontario
has 6 of them (although B.C. does tend to hit #1) so for the most part
costly homes are more widespread in Ontario.. Toronto usually hits #2.

Also, Alberta has made the news in recent past for an advertising ploy to

>attempt to convince British Columbians to move to Alberta, which used BC's
>out-of-control housing prices/cost of living as reasons to relocate. ;)

If you're looking just for cheap housing I wouldn't put Alberta very
close to the top of the list. A lot of provinces didn't even make
the list in the top 10 highest cost.

We tend to think of Alberta as being more like much of the USA.
Very conservative, worse than average healthcare for low income
people and lots of bonuses and lower taxes for rich people.

---
* SLMR Rob * Did you get that, or do I HAVE to include a <GRIN>
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)

Re: Re: MS AI Chief: AI will replace white-collar work
By: Kurt Weiske to Mike Powell on Wed Feb 18 2026 07:50 am

I'm sure the increased profits reaped by labor replacement with AI will
be turned into a universal income and we'll enter tech utopia. Right?

Right?

I heard Michael Kosta's voice as I read this. :-)
--
digital man (rob)

Steven Wright quote #9:
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand.
Norco, CA WX: 84.8øF, 13.0% humidity, 2 mph ENE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)