[Well, we've already had a taste of this, with Musk using AI to make
decisions for DOGE. -- Mike]

AI for President? Here's why, as an AI expert, I think it could happen by 2032

Date:
Mon, 04 Aug 2025 07:33:59 +0000

Description:
Soon, the question won't be 'can AI govern?' but 'why would we govern without it?'

FULL STORY ======================================================================

It sounds like science fiction: Could AI run for president? But as someone
whos spent decades building software systems that prevent failure in high-stakes environments, I believe were approaching a moment when this question wont sound ridiculousit will sound inevitable.

By 2032, AI tools wont just be answering our questions or drafting our
emails. It will be deeply embedded in the systems that shape our lives: our healthcare, our education, our justice systemsand yes, even our governance.
Im not saying well elect a robot to office. But I am saying that an AI might
be the most impartial, consistent, and evidence-driven decision-maker in the room.

Let me explain.

What Software Taught Me About Broken Systems

Building software that anticipates failure taught me to look beyond surface-level issues and ask whats really driving breakdownswhether in code
or in government. Thats what data and AI do best: find meaning in complexity.

Around 2019, I began to notice a deeply unsettling patternone that had
nothing to do with code . Public trust in governments was collapsing. Democracies were paralyzed by short-term incentives, disinformation, and gridlock. Meanwhile, leadership decisions were increasingly detached from facts, drowning in emotion and noise.

I found myself asking the kind of question that gets you strange looks at dinner parties: What if AI could help us govern better than we govern ourselves?

AI Isnt Perfect -- But Neither Are We

When people talk about AI, they usually split into two camps: utopians who believe it will save us, and doomsayers who fear it will destroy us. But Ive worked closely with AI systems. I know what they can doand what they cant.

AI doesnt have desires. It doesnt seek power. It doesnt fear losing elections or gaining popularity. It doesnt lie to protect its ego.

Thats not just a limitation. Its also a strength.

Humans bring empathy, values, and creativitybut also bias, ego, and self-interest. AI, when designed ethically and transparently, brings clarity, consistency, and impartiality. It can help us make data-driven decisions that arent held hostage by emotion or lobbyists.

The realization hit me hard: for decades Ive used technology to reduce
failure in software. Couldnt we use the same thinking to reduce failure in leadership?

What Changed My Thinking

I started imagining a governance model where AI doesnt replace politiciansbut augments them. A system where AI:

- Flags inconsistencies in laws.

- Predicts the impact of policy across different demographics.

- Helps allocate resources more equitably.

- Identifies disinformation in real time.

In short, AI wouldnt run the world. It would help us run it better.

Thats why I coined the term AICracya system where AI assists governance with transparency and ethical guardrails, proposing evidence-based ideas for human leaders to shape, debate, and vote on. Its not automation of politics. Its optimization of decision-making.

What Ive Learned -- and What You Can Take Away

Over the years, Ive come to believe that AI wont undermine leadershipit will elevate it, if we let it. Here are a few principles I live by:

1) AI is only as good as the humans guiding it

Like steel, AI can build bridges or swords. Its up to us to embed values, ethics, and context into the system.

2) Dont see AI as a competitorsee it as an amplifier

It wont replace human intuition. But it can scale clarity and reduce noise in overwhelmed systems.

3) Fairness is a systems challenge, not just a moral one

AI can analyze patterns of inequality and help us interveneif were bold
enough to use it.

4) AI cant make moral decisions -- but it can support more moral systems

Human oversight is critical. The goal isnt to escape responsibility, but to deepen itwith better tools.

Where Its All Headed

Out of curiosity, I recently asked ChatGPT and Gemini how they envision themselves evolving by 2032. Their answers startled menot because they were outlandish, but because they aligned with what I already suspected:

By then, AI will be more transparent, accountable, and aligned with human values. It will help governments, companies, and communities reason across massive complexity in real time. It wont just provide answersit will become a collaborator in solving societys hardest problems.

The question wont be Can AI govern?

It will be: Why would we keep governing without it?

Were not electing an AI presidentyet. But by 2032, we may trust one to help
us decide how to govern better. That, to me, is not far-fetched. Its
necessary.

This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro's Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry
today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not
necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro

======================================================================
Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/pro/ai-for-president-heres-why-as-an-ai-expert-i-thi nk-it-could-happen-by-2032

$$
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)